linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] thunderbolt: Fix a leak in tb_retimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210329145405.GD2356281@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:54:05 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        Kranthi Kuntala <kranthi.kuntala@...el.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thunderbolt: Fix a leak in tb_retimer_add()

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 05:43:23PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:

> The nvm is a separate (physical Linux) device that gets added under this
> one. It cannot be added before AFAICT.

Hum, yes, but then it is odd that a parent is holding sysfs attributes
that refer to a child.

> The code you refer actually looks like this:
> 
> static ssize_t nvm_authenticate_store(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> 	...
>         if (!mutex_trylock(&rt->tb->lock)) {
>                 ret = restart_syscall();
>                 goto exit_rpm;
>         }

Is that lock held during tb_retimer_nvm_add() I looked for a bit and
didn't find something. So someplace more than 4 call site above
mandatory locking is being held?

static void tb_retimer_remove(struct tb_retimer *rt)
{
	dev_info(&rt->dev, "retimer disconnected\n");
	tb_nvm_free(rt->nvm);
	device_unregister(&rt->dev);
}

Here too?

And this is why it is all trylock because it deadlocks with unregister
otherwise?

Jason