linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] platform/x86: toshiba_acpi: use device-managed for wwan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:57:13 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, coproscefalo@...il.com,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux@...iqon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] platform/x86: toshiba_acpi: use device-managed
 for wwan_rfkill management

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:55:46 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com> wrote:

> This change converts the wwan_rfkill object to be free'd automatically when
> the parent refcount goes to zero.
> There are 2 cleanup operations required: rfkill_unregister() and
> rfkill_destroy(). Since they don't have any devm_ variants, they are hooked
> via devm_add_action_or_reset().
> 
> The main reason to do this is to enforce ordering on cleanup, when the
> Toshiba ACPI device is cleaned up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>
Superficially looks fine to me though I don't know much about rfkill.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index 12860ef60e4d..a1249f6dde9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -2591,7 +2591,22 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
>  	.poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
>  };
>  
> -static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +static void toshiba_acpi_rfkill_destroy(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rfkill *wwan_rfk = data;
> +
> +	rfkill_destroy(wwan_rfk);
> +}
> +
> +static void toshiba_acpi_rfkill_unreg(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct rfkill *wwan_rfk = data;
> +
> +	rfkill_unregister(wwan_rfk);
> +}
> +
> +static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct device *parent,
> +					  struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>  
> @@ -2608,15 +2623,27 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, toshiba_acpi_rfkill_destroy,
> +				       dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>  
>  	ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
> -		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, toshiba_acpi_rfkill_unreg,
> +				       dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev->wwan_rfk = NULL;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2996,11 +3023,6 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  		sysfs_remove_group(&dev->acpi_dev->dev.kobj,
>  				   &toshiba_attr_group);
>  
> -	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
> -		rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
> -		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3189,7 +3211,7 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  
>  	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
>  	if (dev->wwan_supported)
> -		toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
> +		toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(parent, dev);
>  
>  	toshiba_cooling_method_available(dev);
>