[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56a58143-863b-b5e4-4498-1190bda3e6bb@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:07:06 +0530
From: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, flove@...ltek.com, derek.fang@...ltek.com,
shumingf@...ltek.com, basavaraj.hiregoudar@....com,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Alexander.Deucher@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: amd: acp-da7219-max98357a: Fix
-Wunused-variable warning
On 3/29/21 8:20 PM, YueHaibing wrote:
> While ACPI is not set, make W=1 warns:
>
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:684:28: warning: ‘cz_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static struct snd_soc_card cz_rt5682_card = {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:671:28: warning: ‘cz_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static struct snd_soc_card cz_card = {
>
> Use #ifdef block to guard this.
For similar kernel warnings, i have previously pushed patch adding ACPI
dependency.
But I got below review comment for my patch "[PATCH 2/2] ASoC: amd: fix
acpi dependency kernel warning" from Arnd
I would suggest simply dropping the unnecessary #ifdef and
ACPI_PTR() guard.
It might be helpful to hide the Kconfig submenu under
'depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST'.
-
Vijendar
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c b/sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c
> index e65e007fc604..1bf0458e22a8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c
> @@ -47,13 +47,15 @@
> #define DUAL_CHANNEL 2
> #define RT5682_PLL_FREQ (48000 * 512)
>
> +extern bool bt_uart_enable;
> +void *acp_soc_is_rltk_max(struct device *dev);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static struct snd_soc_jack cz_jack;
> static struct clk *da7219_dai_wclk;
> static struct clk *da7219_dai_bclk;
> static struct clk *rt5682_dai_wclk;
> static struct clk *rt5682_dai_bclk;
> -extern bool bt_uart_enable;
> -void *acp_soc_is_rltk_max(struct device *dev);
>
> static int cz_da7219_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
> {
> @@ -692,6 +694,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_card cz_rt5682_card = {
> .controls = cz_mc_controls,
> .num_controls = ARRAY_SIZE(cz_mc_controls),
> };
> +#endif
>
> void *acp_soc_is_rltk_max(struct device *dev)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists