lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKkZU3kFiC-5_xwVUNnwzM2QmVS3u1aY-RY=S6_Tw3f5zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:57:25 -0400
From:   Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand the xstate buffer on the
 first use of dynamic user state

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:43 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:

> > *switching* XCR0 on context switch is slow, but perfectly legal.
>
> How slow is it?  And how slow is switching XFD?  XFD is definitely serializing?

XCR0 writes in a VM guest cause a VMEXIT..
XCR writes in a VM guest do not.

I will find out what the relative cost is on bare metal, where VMEXIT
is not an issue.
-- 
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ