linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Separate vvar vma from vdso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 20:59:35 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Separate vvar vma from vdso

On 3/29/21 4:14 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Le 26/03/2021 à 20:17, Dmitry Safonov a écrit :
>> Since commit 511157ab641e ("powerpc/vdso: Move vdso datapage up front")
>> VVAR page is in front of the VDSO area. In result it breaks CRIU
>> (Checkpoint Restore In Userspace) [1], where CRIU expects that "[vdso]"
>> from /proc/../maps points at ELF/vdso image, rather than at VVAR data
>> page.
>> Laurent made a patch to keep CRIU working (by reading aux vector).
>> But I think it still makes sence to separate two mappings into different
>> VMAs. It will also make ppc64 less "special" for userspace and as
>> a side-bonus will make VVAR page un-writable by debugger (which
>> previously
>> would COW page and can be unexpected).
>>
>> I opportunistically Cc stable on it: I understand that usually such
>> stuff isn't a stable material, but that will allow us in CRIU have
>> one workaround less that is needed just for one release (v5.11) on
>> one platform (ppc64), which we otherwise have to maintain.
>> I wouldn't go as far as to say that the commit 511157ab641e is ABI
>> regression as no other userspace got broken, but I'd really appreciate
>> if it gets backported to v5.11 after v5.12 is released, so as not
>> to complicate already non-simple CRIU-vdso code. Thanks!
>>
>> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.11
>> [1]: https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu/issues/1417
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
>> Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> 
> I run the CRIU's test suite and except the usual suspects, all the tests
> passed.
> 
> Tested-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>

Thank you, Laurent!

-- 
          Dmitry