[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a6qlr1xm.fsf@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:10:45 -0400
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, ebiggers@...gle.com, drosen@...gle.com,
ebiggers@...nel.org, yuchao0@...wei.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
andre.almeida@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] fs: unicode: Add utf8 module and a unicode layer
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com> writes:
> On 30/03/21 2:50 am, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>>> +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(_unicode_strncmp, unicode_strncmp_default);
>>> +EXPORT_STATIC_CALL(_unicode_strncmp);
>>> -int unicode_strncmp(const struct unicode_map *um,
>>> - const struct qstr *s1, const struct qstr *s2)
>>> -{
>>> - const struct utf8data *data = utf8nfdi(um->version);
>>> - struct utf8cursor cur1, cur2;
>>> - int c1, c2;
>>> +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(_unicode_strncasecmp, unicode_strncasecmp_default);
>>> +EXPORT_STATIC_CALL(_unicode_strncasecmp);
>> Why are these here if the _default functions are defined in the header
>> file? I think the definitions could be in this file. No?
>
>
> Inline functions defined in header file are using these functions so
> cannot define them here in .c file.
That is not a problem. It is regular C code, you can just move the
definition to the C code and add the declaration to the header file, and
it will work fine.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists