[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hHHFD4cvdRmajWgYbXU5-o-jF-o6D5ud-rg4dWNqt5Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:24:19 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
david <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/devmap: Remove pgmap accounting in the
get_user_pages_fast() path
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:34 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:03:06AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Yes. I still need to answer the question of whether mapping
> > invalidation triggers longterm pin holders to relinquish their hold,
> > but that's a problem regardless of whether gup-fast is supported or
> > not.
>
> It does not, GUP users do not interact with addres_space or mmu
> notifiers
>
Ok, but the SIGKILL from the memory_failure() will drop the pin?
Can memory_failure() find the right processes to kill if the memory
registration has been passed by SCM_RIGHTS?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists