[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210329075608.015358131@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:57:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 14/53] nfs: we dont support removing system.nfs4_acl
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit 4f8be1f53bf615102d103c0509ffa9596f65b718 ]
The NFSv4 protocol doesn't have any notion of reomoving an attribute, so
removexattr(path,"system.nfs4_acl") doesn't make sense.
There's no documented return value. Arguably it could be EOPNOTSUPP but
I'm a little worried an application might take that to mean that we
don't support ACLs or xattrs. How about EINVAL?
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 0cebe0ca03b2..94130588ebf5 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5144,6 +5144,9 @@ static int __nfs4_proc_set_acl(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, size_t bufl
unsigned int npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(buflen, PAGE_SIZE);
int ret, i;
+ /* You can't remove system.nfs4_acl: */
+ if (buflen == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (!nfs4_server_supports_acls(server))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (npages > ARRAY_SIZE(pages))
--
2.30.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists