linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 013/221] blk-cgroup: Fix the recursive blkg rwstat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:55:44 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 013/221] blk-cgroup: Fix the recursive blkg rwstat

From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 4f44657d74873735e93a50eb25014721a66aac19 ]

The current blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive doesn't
work correctly.

As an example, for the following blkcg hierarchy:
 (Made 1GB READ in test1, 512MB READ in test2)
     test
    /    \
 test1   test2

$ head -n 1 test/test1/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
8:0 Read 1073684480
$ head -n 1 test/test2/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
8:0 Read 537448448
$ head -n 1 test/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
8:0 Read 537448448

Clearly, above data of "test" reflects "test2" not "test1"+"test2".

Do the correct summary in blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum().

Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c b/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
index 85d5790ac49b..3304e841df7c 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&blkg->q->queue_lock);
 
+	memset(sum, 0, sizeof(*sum));
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	blkg_for_each_descendant_pre(pos_blkg, pos_css, blkg) {
 		struct blkg_rwstat *rwstat;
@@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ void blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 			rwstat = (void *)pos_blkg + off;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < BLKG_RWSTAT_NR; i++)
-			sum->cnt[i] = blkg_rwstat_read_counter(rwstat, i);
+			sum->cnt[i] += blkg_rwstat_read_counter(rwstat, i);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
-- 
2.30.1