[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91dec1a3b6fe9165d1adab9cc69a788799e64fec.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 23:46:58 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Dan Horák <dan@...ny.cz>
Cc: Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix an underflow on non-4KB-page systems
On 2021-03-30 15:24 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 30.03.21 um 15:23 schrieb Dan Horák:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:09:12 +0800
> > Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-03-30 21:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > On 2021-03-30 14:55 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > I rather see this as a kernel bug. Can you test if this code fragment
> > > > > fixes your issue:
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> > > > > index 64beb3399604..e1260b517e1b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> > > > > @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ int amdgpu_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > > > > *data, struct drm_file *filp)
> > > > > }
> > > > > dev_info->virtual_address_alignment =
> > > > > max((int)PAGE_SIZE, AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > > dev_info->pte_fragment_size = (1 <<
> > > > > adev->vm_manager.fragment_size) * AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> > > > > - dev_info->gart_page_size = AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> > > > > + dev_info->gart_page_size =
> > > > > dev_info->virtual_address_alignment;
> > > > > dev_info->cu_active_number = adev-
> > > > > >gfx.cu_info.number;
> > > > > dev_info->cu_ao_mask = adev->gfx.cu_info.ao_cu_mask;
> > > > > dev_info->ce_ram_size = adev->gfx.ce_ram_size;
> > > > It works. I've seen it at
> > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxen0n%2Flinux%2Fcommit%2F84ada72983838bd7ce54bc32f5d34ac5b5aae191&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cf37fddf20a8847edf67808d8f37ef23c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637527074118791321%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DZnmee38NGpiWRMX5LmlxOhxAzBMhAusnAWNnCxXTJ0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > before (with a common sub-expression, though :).
> > > Some comment: on an old version of Fedora ported by Loongson, Xorg just
> > > hangs
> > > without this commit. But on the system I built from source, I didn't see
> > > any
> > > issue before Linux 5.11. So I misbelieved that it was something already
> > > fixed.
> > >
> > > Dan: you can try it on your PPC 64 with non-4K page as well.
> > yup, looks good here as well, ppc64le (Power9) system with 64KB pages
>
> Mhm, as far as I can say this patch never made it to us.
I think maybe its author considers it a "workaround" like me, as there is
already a "virtual_address_alignment" which seems correct.
> Can you please send it to the mailing list with me on CC?
I've sent it, together with my patch for using ~PAGE_MASK in parameter
validation.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists