linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel/quark: fix incorrect kernel-doc comment syntax in files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f37b726-7f03-99dc-546f-7d33a1f2c6c9@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:32:46 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel/quark: fix incorrect kernel-doc
 comment syntax in files

On 3/30/21 2:30 PM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> There are certain files in arch/x86/platform/intel-quark, which follow this
> syntax, but the content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
> Such lines were probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but are parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warnings from kernel-doc.
> 
> E.g., presence of kernel-doc like comment in the header lines for
> arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c causes these warnings:
> "warning: Function parameter or member 'fmt' not described in 'pr_fmt'"
> "warning: expecting prototype for c(). Prototype was for pr_fmt() instead"
> 
> Similarly for arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c too.
> 
> Provide a simple fix by replacing these occurrences with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210326
> 
>  arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c          | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c
> index 122e0f37b1f5..d3d456925b2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> -/**
> +/*
>   * imr.c -- Intel Isolated Memory Region driver
>   *
>   * Copyright(c) 2013 Intel Corporation.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c
> index 570e3062faac..761f3689f60a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/imr_selftest.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -/**
> +/*
>   * imr_selftest.c -- Intel Isolated Memory Region self-test driver
>   *
>   * Copyright(c) 2013 Intel Corporation.
> 


-- 
~Randy