linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: uaccess: Remove get_fs/set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:10:13 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
CC:     "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: uaccess: Remove get_fs/set_fs call sites

From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 30 March 2021 18:50
> 
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:26:59PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > +#define __get_data(x, ptr, u)						\
> > +	(((u) == true) ? __get_udata((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr))) :	\
> > +			__get_kdata((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr))))
> > +
> 
> I'm a little worried about exposing this in uaccess.h.  Can you
> have local helpers insted, preferably strongly typed for their
> specific use cases?

For things that aren't performance critical it may be worth
using a structure that contains both a kernel and user address
(one of which will be NULL) and passing the offset as a separate
parameter.

(That might have been better for the socket option buffer.)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)