[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210330025345.3980086-1-dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:53:31 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
robdclark@...omium.org,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
Linus W <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/14] drm: Fix EDID reading on ti-sn65dsi86
The primary goal of this series is to try to properly fix EDID reading
for eDP panels using the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge.
Previously we had a patch that added EDID reading but it turned out
not to work at bootup. This caused some extra churn at bootup as we
tried (and failed) to read the EDID several times and also ended up
forcing us to use the hardcoded mode at boot. With this patch series I
believe EDID reading is reliable at boot now and we never use the
hardcoded mode.
This series is the logical successor to the 3-part series containing
the patch ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Properly get the EDID, but only
if refclk") [1] though only one actual patch is the same between the
two.
This series starts out with some general / obvious fixes and moves on
to some more specific and maybe controversial ones. I wouldn't object
to some of the earlier ones landing if they look ready.
This patch was developed against drm-misc-next on a
sc7180-trogdor-lazor device. To get things booting for me, I had to
use Stephen's patch [2] to keep from crashing but otherwise all the
patches I needed were here.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304155144.3.I60a7fb23ce4589006bc95c64ab8d15c74b876e68@changeid/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/161706912161.3012082.17313817257247946143@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com/
Changes in v2:
- Removed 2nd paragraph in commit message.
Douglas Anderson (14):
drm/bridge: Fix the stop condition of drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable()
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Simplify refclk handling
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Remove incorrectly tagged kerneldoc comment
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Reorder remove()
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move MIPI detach() / unregister() to
detach()
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move drm_panel_unprepare() to post_disable()
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Get rid of the useless detect() function
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Remove extra call:
drm_connector_update_edid_property()
drm/edid: Use the cached EDID in drm_get_edid() if eDP
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Stop caching the EDID ourselves
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Power things properly for reading the EDID
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Read the EDID only if refclk was provided
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Print an error if we fallback to panel modes
drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare /
prepare
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 32 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 93 ++++++++++++++-----
5 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
--
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists