linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Check if request has started before processing it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:28:13 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Check if request has started before
 processing it

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:34:25AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> > > It is, but in this situation, the controller is sending a second
> > > completion that results in a use-after-free, which makes the
> > > transport irrelevant. Unless there is some other flow (which is
> > > unclear
> > > to me) that causes this which is a bug that needs to be fixed rather
> > > than hidden with a safeguard.
> > > 
> > 
> > The kernel should not crash regardless of any network traffic that is
> > sent to the system.  It should not be possible to either intentionally
> > of mistakenly contruct packets that will deny service in this way.
> 
> This is not specific to nvme-tcp. I can build an rdma or pci controller
> that can trigger the same crash... I saw a similar patch from Hannes
> implemented in the scsi level, and not the individual scsi transports..

If scsi wants this too, this could be made generic at the blk-mq level.
We just need to make something like blk_mq_tag_to_rq(), but return NULL
if the request isn't started.
 
> I would also mention, that a crash is not even the scariest issue that
> we can see here, because if the request happened to be reused we are
> in the silent data corruption realm...

If this does happen, I think we have to come up with some way to
mitigate it. We're not utilizing the full 16 bits of the command_id, so
maybe we can append something like a generation sequence number that can
be checked for validity.