linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix spelling mistake "disabed" -> "disabled"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 22:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org
CC:     colin.king@...onical.com, guoren@...nel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix spelling mistake "disabed" -> "disabled"

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:42:23 PDT (-0700), rostedt@...dmis.org wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
> Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, this is on fixes.
>
> What does this mean? Is there a tree that spelling fixes go through now?
>
> I had already pulled this patch into my queue for the next merge window
> (and it's still in the testing phase with other patches before going to
> linux-next).
>
> Should I drop it?

Oh, sorry.  It's on the fixes branch of the riscv tree 
<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git> .  
It's what I sent up to Linus every week, this one already went up.

I must have not been looking closely enough, for some reason I thought 
this only touched the riscv tree.  I wouldn't have taken it without an 
Ack if I'd noticed, I guess just because it was only a comment spelling 
change I hadn't checked the paths.  I'll try not to do that again.