[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chhFnYyUv++RzJRXomHq0vZN2LrbCAOBPg67MDeg6saOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:26:49 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Yao Jin <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, gustavoars@...nel.org,
mliska@...e.cz, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
zhangjinhao2@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] perf annotate: Fix sample events lost in stdio mode
Hi Yang and Arnaldo,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:16 AM Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2021/3/26 20:06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So it seems to be working, what am I missing? Is this strictly non
> > group related?
> >
> Yes, it is non group related.
> This problem occurs only when different events need to be recorded at
> the same time, i.e.:
> perf record -e branch-misses -e branch-instructions -a sleep 1
>
> The output results of perf script and perf annotate do not match.
> Some events are not output in perf annotate.
Yeah I think it's related to sort keys. The code works with a single
hist_entry for each event and symbol. But the default sort key
creates multiple entries for different threads and it causes the
confusion.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists