lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:08:15 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To:     Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Saruhan Karademir <skarade@...rosoft.com>,
        Juan Vazquez <juvazq@...rosoft.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: storvsc: Validate length of incoming packet in
 storvsc_on_channel_callback()

Hi Olaf,

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 06:37:21PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, Andrea Parri (Microsoft) wrote:
> 
> > Check that the packet is of the expected size at least, don't copy data
> > past the packet.
> 
> > +		if (hv_pkt_datalen(desc) < sizeof(struct vstor_packet) -
> > +				stor_device->vmscsi_size_delta) {
> > +			dev_err(&device->device, "Invalid packet len\n");
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> Sorry for being late:
> 
> It might be just cosmetic, but should this check be done prior the call to vmbus_request_addr()?

TBH, I'm not immediately seeing why it 'should'; it could make sense to move
the check on the packet data length.


> Unrelated: my copy of vmbus_request_addr() can return 0, which is apparently not handled by this loop in storvsc_on_channel_callback().

Indeed, IDs of 0 are reserved for so called unsolicited messages; I think we
should check that storvsc_on_io_completion() is not called on such messages.

Thanks,
  Andrea

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ