[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADoALwDyDqqKqolXZoBMHqqQ.3.1617068062644.Hmail.wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:34:22 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: 万家兵 <wanjiabing@...o.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@....com>,
Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@....com>,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@....com>,
Krunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@....com>,
Jacky Liao <ziyu.liao@....com>,
Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@....com>,
Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@....com>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kael_w@...h.net
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] amd: display: dc: struct dc_state is declared twice
>On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:28 AM Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com> wrote:
>>
>> struct dc_state has been declared at 273rd line.
>> Remove the duplicate.
>> Delete duplicate blank lines.
>
>Can you split these into separate patches?
>
>Alex
OK. But in fact, what I did is simple.
The most important thing is removing the duplicate
struct dc_state declaration at 585th line.
Others are all deleting duplicate blank lines.
So maybe I should send two patchs, one is removing
duplicate declaration, the other is deleting blank lines?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h | 10 ----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h
>> index 18ed0d3f247e..dc667298ab5b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h
>> @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ struct dc_static_screen_params {
>> unsigned int num_frames;
>> };
>>
>> -
>> /* Surface update type is used by dc_update_surfaces_and_stream
>> * The update type is determined at the very beginning of the function based
>> * on parameters passed in and decides how much programming (or updating) is
>> @@ -272,7 +271,6 @@ struct dc;
>> struct dc_plane_state;
>> struct dc_state;
>>
>> -
>> struct dc_cap_funcs {
>> bool (*get_dcc_compression_cap)(const struct dc *dc,
>> const struct dc_dcc_surface_param *input,
>> @@ -281,7 +279,6 @@ struct dc_cap_funcs {
>>
>> struct link_training_settings;
>>
>> -
>> /* Structure to hold configuration flags set by dm at dc creation. */
>> struct dc_config {
>> bool gpu_vm_support;
>> @@ -581,7 +578,6 @@ struct dc_bounding_box_overrides {
>> int min_dcfclk_mhz;
>> };
>>
>> -struct dc_state;
Removing the duplicate is here.
And others are all deleting duplicate blank line.
I think they are in the same file. I want to remove the declaration first.
By the way, I deleted the blank line.
Yours,
Wan Jiabing
>> struct resource_pool;
>> struct dce_hwseq;
>> struct gpu_info_soc_bounding_box_v1_0;
>> @@ -757,7 +753,6 @@ enum dc_transfer_func_predefined {
>> TRANSFER_FUNCTION_GAMMA26
>> };
>>
>> -
>> struct dc_transfer_func {
>> struct kref refcount;
>> enum dc_transfer_func_type type;
>> @@ -770,7 +765,6 @@ struct dc_transfer_func {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> -
>> union dc_3dlut_state {
>> struct {
>> uint32_t initialized:1; /*if 3dlut is went through color module for initialization */
>> @@ -784,7 +778,6 @@ union dc_3dlut_state {
>> uint32_t raw;
>> };
>>
>> -
>> struct dc_3dlut {
>> struct kref refcount;
>> struct tetrahedral_params lut_3d;
>> @@ -1014,7 +1007,6 @@ enum dc_status dc_validate_global_state(
>> struct dc_state *new_ctx,
>> bool fast_validate);
>>
>> -
>> void dc_resource_state_construct(
>> const struct dc *dc,
>> struct dc_state *dst_ctx);
>> @@ -1167,7 +1159,6 @@ struct dc_container_id {
>> unsigned short productCode;
>> };
>>
>> -
>> struct dc_sink_dsc_caps {
>> // 'true' if these are virtual DPCD's DSC caps (immediately upstream of sink in MST topology),
>> // 'false' if they are sink's DSC caps
>> @@ -1229,7 +1220,6 @@ struct dc_cursor {
>> struct dc_cursor_attributes attributes;
>> };
>>
>> -
>> /*******************************************************************************
>> * Interrupt interfaces
>> ******************************************************************************/
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists