linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:23:06 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     tanghui20 <tanghui20@...wei.com>
Cc:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, xuzaibo@...wei.com,
        wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon - check if debugfs opened

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:09:46PM +0800, tanghui20 wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/3/28 23:09, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 04:33:00PM +0800, Hui Tang wrote:
> > > 'xx_debugfs_init' check if debugfs opened.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_main.c | 5 ++++-
> > >  drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c             | 3 +++
> > >  drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_main.c  | 5 ++++-
> > >  drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_main.c   | 3 +++
> > >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_main.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_main.c
> > > index c7ab06d..f2605c4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_main.c
> > > @@ -779,6 +779,9 @@ static int hpre_debugfs_init(struct hisi_qm *qm)
> > >  	struct device *dev = &qm->pdev->dev;
> > >  	int ret;
> > > 
> > > +	if (!debugfs_initialized())
> > > +		return -ENOENT;
> > 
> > Why?  What does this help with?  Why does the code care if debugfs is
> > running or not?
> > 
> When !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, there is no problem if debugfs is not checked,
> but if checking debugfs, a series of stub functions of debugfs can be
> skipped and 'xx_debugfs_init' will be return immediately.

And have you measured an actual speed difference for that?  I would be
amazed if you could...

thanks,

greg k-h