lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ad14d9d-5694-432a-6376-b776a4acebfa@darmarit.de>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:43:45 +0200
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: better handle '::' sequences


Am 30.03.21 um 13:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> If the introduction were "/*rST" instead of "/**", would we have
>> consensus?  It gives us a path to let people intermix kernel-doc and
>> hawkmoth comments in the same file, which would be amazing.

> If you want to allow two syntaxes for documentation comments (current
> kernel-doc and pure reStructuredText with just the comment markers and
> indentation removed) I think the natural first step would be to modify
> kernel-doc the perl script to support that. It would probably even be
> trivial.

My 2cent: to tag the markup of the documentation, in python they
use a variable named __docformat__ [PEP-258] / e.g.:

         __docformat__ = "restructuredtext en"

[PEP-258] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0258/#choice-of-docstring-format

 > Perhaps the bare minimum is running rustdoc first, and generating the
 > results into Sphinx static pages [1], to make them part of the
 > whole. Even if the HTML style might be different.

Cross referencing will be problematic, I think.

   -- Markus --

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ