[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGMo4K4b9GIUIGu8@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:34:24 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Microchip UNG Driver List <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next 1/1] phy: Sparx5 Eth SerDes: Use direct
register operations
> > > +static int sparx5_sd25g28_apply_params(struct sparx5_serdes_macro *macro,
> > > + struct sparx5_sd25g28_params *params)
> > > {
> > > - struct sparx5_serdes_regval item[] = {
> >
> > Could you just add const here, and then it is no longer on the stack?
> >
> > Andrew
>
> No it still counts against the stack even as a const structure.
I'm surprised. Maybe it needs static as well?
I'm just thinking you can get a much smaller patch if you don't need
to modify the table, just add additional qualifiers.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists