linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mmotm] mm: vmscan: fix shrinker_rwsem in free_shrinker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:06:39 -0700
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] mm: vmscan: fix shrinker_rwsem in free_shrinker_info()

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 6:54 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:44 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Lockdep warns mm/vmscan.c: suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
> > when free_shrinker_info() is called from mem_cgroup_css_free(): there it
> > is called with no locking, whereas alloc_shrinker_info() calls it with
> > down_write of shrinker_rwsem - which seems appropriate.  Rearrange that
> > so free_shrinker_info() can manage the shrinker_rwsem for itself.
> >
> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317140615.GB28839@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Sorry, I've made no attempt to work out precisely where in the series
> > the locking went missing, nor tried to fit this in as a fix on top of
> > mm-vmscan-add-shrinker_info_protected-helper.patch
> > which Oliver reported (and which you notated in mmotm's "series" file).
> > This patch just adds the fix to the end of the series, after
> > mm-vmscan-shrink-deferred-objects-proportional-to-priority.patch
>
> The patch "mm: vmscan: add shrinker_info_protected() helper" replaces
> rcu_dereference_protected(shrinker_info, true) with
> rcu_dereference_protected(shrinker_info,
> lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem)).
>
> I think we don't really need shrinker_rwsem in free_shrinker_info()
> which is called from css_free(). The bits of the map have already been
> 'reparented' in css_offline. I think we can remove
> lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem) for free_shrinker_info().

Thanks, Hugh and Shakeel. I missed the report.

I think Shakeel is correct, shrinker_rwsem is not required in css_free
path so Shakeel's proposal should be able to fix it. I prepared a
patch:

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 64bf07cc20f2..7348c26d4cac 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
        for_each_node(nid) {
                pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
-               info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
+               /*
+                * Don't use shrinker_info_protected() helper since
+                * free_shrinker_info() could be called by css_free()
+                * without holding shrinker_rwsem.
+                */
+               info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
                kvfree(info);
                rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
        }
>
> >
> >  mm/vmscan.c |   10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- mmotm/mm/vmscan.c   2021-03-28 17:26:54.935553064 -0700
> > +++ linux/mm/vmscan.c   2021-03-30 15:55:13.374459559 -0700
> > @@ -249,18 +249,20 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
> >         struct shrinker_info *info;
> >         int nid;
> >
> > +       down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> >         for_each_node(nid) {
> >                 pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
> >                 info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >                 kvfree(info);
> >                 rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
> >         }
> > +       up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> >  }
> >
> >  int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >  {
> >         struct shrinker_info *info;
> > -       int nid, size, ret = 0;
> > +       int nid, size;
> >         int map_size, defer_size = 0;
> >
> >         down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> > @@ -270,9 +272,9 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
> >         for_each_node(nid) {
> >                 info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> >                 if (!info) {
> > +                       up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> >                         free_shrinker_info(memcg);
> > -                       ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -                       break;
> > +                       return -ENOMEM;
> >                 }
> >                 info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1);
> >                 info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size;
> > @@ -280,7 +282,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
> >         }
> >         up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> >
> > -       return ret;
> > +       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline bool need_expand(int nr_max)