[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210331184344.GA1534472@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:43:44 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] RDMA/iw_cxgb4: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:01:05AM +0800, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to for-next, thanks
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists