linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Merge module sections if and only if CONFIG_LTO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YGTWdju9UiDGRCCJ@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:07:18 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Merge module sections if and only if
 CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is enabled

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:45:36PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:36 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:44 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Merge module sections only when using Clang LTO.  With gcc-10, merging
> > > > > > sections does not appear to update the symbol tables for the module,
> > > > > > e.g. 'readelf -s' shows the value that a symbol would have had, if
> > > > > > sections were not merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm fine with limiting this to LTO only, but it would be helpful to
> > > > > understand which sections are actually getting merged here.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't appear to matter which sections get merged, the tables only show the
> > > > correct data if there is no merging whatsoever, e.g. allowing merging for any
> > > > one of the four types (.bss, .data, .rodata and .text) results in breakage.
> > > > AFAICT, merging any sections causes the layout to change and throw off the
> > > > symbol tables.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the clarification. I can reproduce this issue with gcc +
> > > bfd if any of the sections are merged, but gcc + lld produces valid
> > > symbol tables.
> > 
> > FWIW, clang + bfd also produces mangled tables, so it does appear to be bfd
> > specific.
> 
> Are you able to open a bug against bfd for this?

Yes?  I'll ping you when I run into trouble ;-)