[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGUGYi4Q3Uxyol6r@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 02:31:46 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@....com>,
Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@...gutronix.de>,
Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP
CAAM-based trusted keys
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:47:18PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:37:23PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, TPM trusted keys started this bad security practice, and
> > obviously it cannot be fixed without breaking uapi backwards compatibility.
> >
>
> The whole point of a randomness source is that it is random. So userspace can't
> be depending on any particular output, and the randomness source can be changed
> without breaking backwards compatibility.
>
> So IMO, trusted keys should simply be fixed to use get_random_bytes().
>
> - Eric
It's a bummer but uapi is the god in the end. Since TPM does not do it
today, that behaviour must be supported forever. That's why a boot option
AND a warning would be the best compromise.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists