linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 05/11] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210331073952.102162-6-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:39:46 +0300
From:   Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
To:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
        Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@....com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, cang@...eaurora.org,
        stanley.chu@...iatek.com, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/11] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's reads

In host mode, eviction is considered an extreme measure.
verify that the entering region has enough reads, and the exiting
region has much less reads.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
index 3ab66421dc00..aefb6dc160ee 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include "../sd.h"
 
 #define ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD 8 /* 8 IOs */
+#define EVICTION_THRESHOLD (ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD << 5) /* 256 IOs */
 
 /* memory management */
 static struct kmem_cache *ufshpb_mctx_cache;
@@ -1057,6 +1058,13 @@ static struct ufshpb_region *ufshpb_victim_lru_info(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
 		if (ufshpb_check_srgns_issue_state(hpb, rgn))
 			continue;
 
+		/*
+		 * in host control mode, verify that the exiting region
+		 * has less reads
+		 */
+		if (hpb->is_hcm && rgn->reads > (EVICTION_THRESHOLD >> 1))
+			continue;
+
 		victim_rgn = rgn;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -1229,7 +1237,7 @@ static int ufshpb_issue_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 
 static int ufshpb_add_region(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
 {
-	struct ufshpb_region *victim_rgn;
+	struct ufshpb_region *victim_rgn = NULL;
 	struct victim_select_info *lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -1256,7 +1264,15 @@ static int ufshpb_add_region(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
 			 * It is okay to evict the least recently used region,
 			 * because the device could detect this region
 			 * by not issuing HPB_READ
+			 *
+			 * in host control mode, verify that the entering
+			 * region has enough reads
 			 */
+			if (hpb->is_hcm && rgn->reads < EVICTION_THRESHOLD) {
+				ret = -EACCES;
+				goto out;
+			}
+
 			victim_rgn = ufshpb_victim_lru_info(hpb);
 			if (!victim_rgn) {
 				dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
-- 
2.25.1