[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ft0b6926.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:06:57 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jindong Yue <jindong.yue@....com>, fweisbec@...il.com,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jindong.yue@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tick/broadcast: Allow later registered device enter oneshot mode
On Wed, Mar 31 2021 at 09:10, Jindong Yue wrote:
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static inline void tick_resume_broadcast_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
> static inline void tick_broadcast_oneshot_offline(unsigned int cpu) { }
> # endif
> #endif
> +static void tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev);
Leftover ...
> /*
> * Debugging: see timer_list.c
> @@ -107,6 +108,19 @@ void tick_install_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *dev)
> tick_broadcast_device.evtdev = dev;
> if (!cpumask_empty(tick_broadcast_mask))
> tick_broadcast_start_periodic(dev);
> +
> + if (!(dev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * If system already runs in oneshot mode, switch new registered
the system .... the newly registered
> + * broadcast device to oneshot mode explicitly if possiable.
s/possible/possiable/
But the 'if possible' makes no sense here. The above check for
CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT established that it _is_ possible. So just remove
the 'if ...'.
> + */
> + if (tick_broadcast_oneshot_active()) {
> + tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot();
> + return;
> + }
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists