[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <569a089e-471f-8182-cdb2-74188f0cc81d@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:41:04 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers
On 31/03/21 11:34, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>> Queued and 1-9 and 18, thanks. There's a small issue in patch 10 that
>> prevented me from committing 10-15, but they mostly look good.
>
> Can you please push the resulting merge somewhere?
>
> I'm concerned that it will conflict in interesting way with other stuff
> that is on its way on the arm64 side, not to mentiobn that this hasn't
> been tested at all on anything but x86 (and given the series was posted
> on Friday, that's a bit of a short notice).
Yes, I will push it shortly to kvm/queue. Note that the patches I have
pushed are x86 only apart from changes to tracepoints. The rest will
certainly need a lot more baking, which is also why I got rid quickly of
the easy ones.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists