linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a6qj6474.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:51:59 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux-RT-Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead

On Wed, Mar 31 2021 at 09:52, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Ingo, Thomas or Peter, is there any chance one of you could take a look
> at patch "[PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to
> local_lock" from this series? It's partially motivated by PREEMPT_RT. More
> details below.

Sure.