linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/40] staging: rtl8723bs: replace RT_TRACE with public printk wrappers in core/rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210331103630.GA1450@agape.jhs>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:36:31 +0200
From:   Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     dan.carpenter@...cle.com, joe@...ches.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/40] staging: rtl8723bs: replace RT_TRACE with public
 printk wrappers in core/rtw_eeprom.c

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > replace private macro RT_TRACE for tracing with in-kernel
> > pr_* printk wrappers
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c | 26 ++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > index 3cbd65dee741..6176d741d60e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void shift_out_bits(_adapter *padapter, u16 data, u16 count)
> >  _func_enter_;
> >  
> >  	if (padapter->bSurpriseRemoved == true) {
> > -		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_eeprom_c_, _drv_err_, ("padapter->bSurpriseRemoved==true"));

I looked at this ---------------------------------------^
and so I thought that pr_err was good...

> > +		pr_err("%s padapter->bSurpriseRemoved==true", DRIVER_PREFIX);
> 
> As Dan said, this is not the same thing.  You are now always printing
> out this mess, when before you were not unless you explicitly enabled
> "tracing".
> 
> And you are sending it to the error log?
> 
> And finally, drivers should never be using pr_*() for messages, they
> should be using dev_*() instead as they are a driver and have access to
> a device pointer.
> 

thank you, I didn't know about dev_*

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

my aim was remove private macros replicating component tracing and log levels...

so what's best? Keep a simplyfied RT_TRACE encapsulating a dev_* call?

thank you,

fabio