[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcc3CNXguMK-ZhRfvfjVBQBbcGEYK_+WQAmb_Sw5-Derw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:29:02 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: tqmx86: really make IRQ optional
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:37 PM Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
>
> The tqmx86 MFD driver was passing IRQ 0 for "no IRQ" in the past. This
> causes warnings with newer kernels.
>
> Prepare the gpio-tqmx86 driver for the fixed MFD driver by handling a
> missing IRQ properly.
...
> - irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq < 0)
> + irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> return irq;
This is a dead code now. I suggest you to do the opposite, i.e.
if (irq < 0)
irq = 0;
In such a case below change is not required.
...
> - if (irq) {
> + if (irq > 0) {
> struct irq_chip *irq_chip = &gpio->irq_chip;
> u8 irq_status;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists