linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] bus: mhi: core: Introduce internal register poll helper function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210331130347.GI15610@work>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:33:47 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org,
        jhugo@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        carl.yin@...ctel.com, naveen.kumar@...ctel.com,
        loic.poulain@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] bus: mhi: core: Introduce internal register poll
 helper function

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> Introduce helper function to allow MHI core driver to poll for
> a value in a register field. This helps reach a common path to
> read and poll register values along with a retry time interval.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> index 6f80ec3..005286b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> @@ -643,6 +643,9 @@ int __must_check mhi_read_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  int __must_check mhi_read_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  				    void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 mask,
>  				    u32 shift, u32 *out);
> +int __must_check mhi_poll_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> +				    void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 mask,
> +				    u32 shift, u32 val, u32 delayus);
>  void mhi_write_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, void __iomem *base,
>  		   u32 offset, u32 val);
>  void mhi_write_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, void __iomem *base,
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> index 4e0131b..6f4b630 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>   *
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-direction.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> @@ -37,6 +38,28 @@ int __must_check mhi_read_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int __must_check mhi_poll_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> +				    void __iomem *base, u32 offset,
> +				    u32 mask, u32 shift, u32 val, u32 delayus)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 out, retry = (mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms * 1000) / delayus;
> +
> +	while (retry--) {
> +		ret = mhi_read_reg_field(mhi_cntrl, base, offset, mask, shift,
> +					 &out);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if (out == val)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		fsleep(delayus);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOENT;

Maybe I'm too late on this one, but I don't think -ENOENT is the correct
error code here. The error code will be returned only when the reg field
value didn't change as expected, so in that case it should be -EINVAL or
-ETIMEDOUT, no?

Thanks,
Mani

> +}
> +
>  void mhi_write_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, void __iomem *base,
>  		   u32 offset, u32 val)
>  {
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>