linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:18:54 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        bskeggs@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        jhubbard@...dia.com, rcampbell@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com,
        hch@...radead.org, daniel@...ll.ch, willy@...radead.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:59:28PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:

> I guess that makes sense as the split could go either way at the
> moment but I should add a check to make sure this isn't used with
> pinned pages anyway.

Is it possible to have a pinned page under one of these things? If I
pin it before you migrate it then it remains pinned but hidden under
the swap entry?

So the special logic is needed and the pinned page has to be copied
and written as a normal pte, not dropped as a migration entry

Jason