lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc5Nw+GJ4tFeciYZQhJ_NbRZMJjJNcWeFq7nOuAOe0=jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:11:37 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMxE40M

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:33 PM Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 15:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:38 PM Matthias Schiffer
> > <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:

...

> > > +               return 24000;
> >
> > AFAICS it will return 24 MHz for "Unknown" board. Is it okay to be so brave?
>
> As noted in the commit message, our hardware developers intend to use
> 24 MHz for all future x86 SoMs.

What may go wrong in the future?.. (rhetorical question, obviously)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ