[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc5Nw+GJ4tFeciYZQhJ_NbRZMJjJNcWeFq7nOuAOe0=jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:11:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMxE40M
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:33 PM Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 15:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:38 PM Matthias Schiffer
> > <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
...
> > > + return 24000;
> >
> > AFAICS it will return 24 MHz for "Unknown" board. Is it okay to be so brave?
>
> As noted in the commit message, our hardware developers intend to use
> 24 MHz for all future x86 SoMs.
What may go wrong in the future?.. (rhetorical question, obviously)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists