[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W6SABggAaBbw9LXdf5sHOGGQzZJp8YFmYcWG1yf1rW5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:32:12 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Stop caching the EDID ourselves
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:12 AM Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>
> W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze:
> > Now that we have the patch ("drm/edid: Use the cached EDID in
> > drm_get_edid() if eDP") we no longer need to maintain our own
> > cache. Drop this code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Note that unless the advice given to me changes, I'm dropping
${SUBJECT} patch on the next spin and putting the EDID cache back in
the bridge driver. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/YGMvO3PNDCiBmqov@intel.com/
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists