linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/16] media: ti-vpe: csi2rx: Add CSI2RX support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210331154456.t6edvpw6mfwlf2zg@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:44:57 -0500
From:   Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
CC:     Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] media: ti-vpe: csi2rx: Add CSI2RX support

Pratyush,

Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com> wrote on Wed [2021-Mar-31 09:06:35 +0300]:
> Hi,
> 
> On 30/03/2021 20:33, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > TI's J721E uses the Cadence CSI2RX and DPHY peripherals to facilitate
> > capture over a CSI-2 bus.
> > 
> > The Cadence CSI2RX IP acts as a bridge between the TI specific parts and
> > the CSI-2 protocol parts. TI then has a wrapper on top of this bridge
> > called the SHIM layer. It takes in data from stream 0, repacks it, and
> > sends it to memory over PSI-L DMA.
> > 
> > This driver acts as the "front end" to V4L2 client applications. It
> > implements the required ioctls and buffer operations, passes the
> > necessary calls on to the bridge, programs the SHIM layer, and performs
> > DMA via the dmaengine API to finally return the data to a buffer
> > supplied by the application.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
> > ---
> >   MAINTAINERS                               |   7 +
> >   drivers/media/platform/Kconfig            |  11 +
> >   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/Makefile    |   1 +
> >   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/ti-csi2rx.c | 964 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   4 files changed, 983 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/ti-csi2rx.c
> 
> Some quick comments:
> 
> "ti-vpe" directory is not correct, this has nothing to do with VPE. That
> said, the directory has already been abused by having CAL driver there,
> perhaps we should rename the directory just to "ti". But if we do that,
> I think we should have subdirs for cal, vpe and this new one.

I agree with Tomi here. This should create a ti directory under
media/platform and then add a directory under that specifically for this
driver/IP as a first step. Not sure what the correct name for that
directory should be but it should meaningful. As a follow on step then the
other drivers can be relocated to a proper directory structure.
> 
> "ti-csi2rx" is rather generic name. TI has had CSI-2 RX IPs before (CAL)
> and probably will also have new ones in the future. If there's no clear
> model name for the IP, as I think is the case here, it's probably best
> to just use the SoC model in the name. E.g. the DSS on J7 is
> "ti,j721e-dss".
> 
> This driver implements the legacy video API. I think it would be better
> (and easier to maintain) to only implement the media-controller API,
> unless you specifically need to support the legacy API for existing
> userspace.

We just went through a major rework with CAL to make it media controller
compatible in order to be able to handle CSI2 virtual channels.
I think as this is a new driver/IP which perform the same type of service
it makes sense to make use the more current API instead of the legacy one.

> 
>  Tomi

Benoit