[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210401134236.GF1463678@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 10:42:36 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and
allocation APIs
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:38:46PM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 8:05 PM
> [...]
> >
> > Also wondering about:
> >
> > * Querying IOMMU nesting capabilities before binding page tables (which
> > page table formats are supported?). We were planning to have a VFIO cap,
> > but I'm guessing we need to go back to the sysfs solution?
>
> I think it can also be with /dev/ioasid.
Sure, anything to do with page table formats and setting page tables
should go through ioasid.
> > * Invalidation, probably an ioasid_fd ioctl?
>
> yeah, if we are doing bind/unbind_pagtable via ioasid_fd, then yes,
> invalidation should go this way as well. This is why I worried it may
> fail to meet the requirement from you and Eric.
Yes, all manipulation of page tables, including removing memory ranges, or
setting memory ranges to trigger a page fault behavior should go
through here.
> > * Page faults, page response. From and to devices, and don't necessarily
> > have a PASID. But needed by vdpa as well, so that's also going through
> > /dev/ioasid?
>
> page faults should still be per-device, but the fault event fd may be stored
> in /dev/ioasid. page response would be in /dev/ioasid just like invalidation.
Here you mean non-SVA page faults that are delegated to userspace to handle?
Why would that be per-device?
Can you show the flow you imagine?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists