[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <647d9b70-4efe-41e6-e592-74331d66b675@metux.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:20:50 +0200
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Srikanth Krishnakar <skrishnakar@...il.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: simatic-ipc-leds: add new driver for Siemens
Industial PCs
On 27.03.21 10:46, Henning Schild wrote:
>> In this case, they seem to be assigned to certain specific functions
>> (by physical labels on the box), so IMHO the LED names should reflect
>> that in some ways.
>
> The choice for "status" was because of
>
>>> /* Miscelleaus functions. Use functions above if you can. */
>
> And those known names do not really come with an explanation of their
> meaning. Names like "bluetooth" seem obvious, but "activity" or
> "indicator" leave a lot of room for speculation.
Maybe we should revise these and add more functions ?
Can you find out some more details, what these LEDs really had been
intented for ?
--mtx
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists