[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210401151044.GZ1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:10:44 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, weifeng.voon@...el.com,
boon.leong.ong@...el.com, qiangqing.zhang@....com,
vee.khee.wong@...el.com, fugang.duan@....com,
kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: enable 2.5Gbps link speed
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:01:51PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> + /* 2.5G mode only support 2500baseT full duplex only */
> + if (priv->plat->has_gmac4 && priv->plat->speed_2500_en) {
> + phylink_set(mac_supported, 2500baseT_Full);
> + phylink_set(mask, 10baseT_Half);
> + phylink_set(mask, 10baseT_Full);
> + phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Half);
> + phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Full);
> + phylink_set(mask, 1000baseT_Half);
> + phylink_set(mask, 1000baseT_Full);
> + phylink_set(mask, 1000baseKX_Full);
Why? This seems at odds to the comment above?
What about 2500baseX_Full ?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists