[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGVUobKUMUtEy1PS@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:05:37 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] Memory Folios
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:09:29PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> That's a very Intel-centric way of looking at it. Other architectures
> support a multitude of page sizes, from the insane ia64 (4k, 8k, 16k, then
> every power of four up to 4GB) to more reasonable options like (4k, 32k,
> 256k, 2M, 16M, 128M). But we (in software) shouldn't constrain ourselves
> to thinking in terms of what the hardware currently supports. Google
> have data showing that for their workloads, 32kB is the goldilocks size.
> I'm sure for some workloads, it's much higher and for others it's lower.
> But for almost no workload is 4kB the right choice any more, and probably
> hasn't been since the late 90s.
Out of curiosity I looked at the distribution of file sizes in the
kernel tree:
71455 files total
0--4Kb 36702
4--8Kb 11820
8--16Kb 10066
16--32Kb 6984
32--64Kb 3804
64--128Kb 1498
128--256Kb 393
256--512Kb 108
512Kb--1Mb 35
1--2Mb 25
2--4Mb 5
4--6Mb 7
6--8Mb 4
12Mb 2
14Mb 1
16Mb 1
... incidentally, everything bigger than 1.2Mb lives^Wshambles under
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/asic_reg/
Page size Footprint
4Kb 1128Mb
8Kb 1324Mb
16Kb 1764Mb
32Kb 2739Mb
64Kb 4832Mb
128Kb 9191Mb
256Kb 18062Mb
512Kb 35883Mb
1Mb 71570Mb
2Mb 142958Mb
So for kernel builds (as well as grep over the tree, etc.) uniform 2Mb pages
would be... interesting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists