[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd90d2a05aa0411ee7a976a89a361af@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:09:13 +0530
From: rojay@...eaurora.org
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, akashast@...eaurora.org,
msavaliy@....qualcomm.com, parashar@...eaurora.org,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Add support for
'assigned-performance-states'
On 2021-02-12 14:51, rojay@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-01-20 19:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 12:05, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19-01-21, 12:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> > As a matter of fact this was quite recently discussed [1], which also
>>> > pointed out some issues when using the "required-opps" in combination,
>>> > but perhaps that got resolved? Viresh?
>>>
>>> Perhaps we never did anything there ..
>>
>> Okay. Looks like we should pick up that discussion again, to conclude
>> on how to move forward.
>>
>
> Soft Reminder!
>
Request Viresh, Uffe to discuss on the way forward.
>>>
>>> --
>>> viresh
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
> - Roja
Powered by blists - more mailing lists