[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1617259087-5502-4-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:38:05 +0800
From: Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@...iatek.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <Jackson-kt.Chang@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] soc: mediatek: devapc: rename variable for new IC support
From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@...iatek.com>
For new ICs, there are multiple devapc HWs for different subsys.
For example, there is devapc respectively for infra, peri, peri2, etc.
So we rename the variable 'infra_base' to 'base' for code readability.
Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@...iatek.com>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index 68c3e35..bcf6e3c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_data {
struct mtk_devapc_context {
struct device *dev;
- void __iomem *infra_base;
+ void __iomem *base;
u32 vio_idx_num;
struct clk *infra_clk;
const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
void __iomem *reg;
int i;
- reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
+ reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num - 1); i++)
writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
u32 val;
int i;
- reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_mask_offset;
+ reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_mask_offset;
if (mask)
val = GENMASK(31, 0);
@@ -113,11 +113,11 @@ static int devapc_sync_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
int ret;
u32 val;
- pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+ pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->base +
ctx->data->vio_shift_sta_offset;
- pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+ pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->base +
ctx->data->vio_shift_sel_offset;
- pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+ pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->base +
ctx->data->vio_shift_con_offset;
/* Find the minimum shift group which has violation */
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
- vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
- vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
+ vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
+ vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
vio_dbgs.vio_dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1 = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number, void *data)
*/
static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
{
- writel(BIT(31), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+ writel(BIT(31), ctx->base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
mask_module_irq(ctx, false);
}
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void stop_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
{
mask_module_irq(ctx, true);
- writel(BIT(2), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+ writel(BIT(2), ctx->base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
}
static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ctx->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
ctx->dev = &pdev->dev;
- ctx->infra_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
- if (!ctx->infra_base)
+ ctx->base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+ if (!ctx->base)
return -EINVAL;
if (of_property_read_u32(node, "vio_idx_num", &ctx->vio_idx_num))
--
2.6.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists