[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35e8c3ce5d4265b4e7294b4296c60484aab6adbc.camel@ew.tq-group.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 10:06:47 +0200
From: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMxE40M
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 09:04 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:33 PM Matthias Schiffer
> > <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 15:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:38 PM Matthias Schiffer
> > > > <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > + return 24000;
> > > >
> > > > AFAICS it will return 24 MHz for "Unknown" board. Is it okay to be so brave?
> > >
> > > As noted in the commit message, our hardware developers intend to use
> > > 24 MHz for all future x86 SoMs.
> >
> > What may go wrong in the future?.. (rhetorical question, obviously)
>
> My preference would be to be explicit.
>
> Rather than support boards implicitly i.e. by accident.
>
How about logging a warning for unknown boards, but still returning
24 MHz?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists