[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <628222835.139597.1617272637645.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel <kernel@...gutronix.de>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
horia geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
aymen sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@....com>,
Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@...gutronix.de>,
david <david@...ma-star.at>,
Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
"open list, ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP
CAAM-based trusted keys
Ahmad,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>> That way existing blobs can also be used with this implementation.
>> IIRC the NXP vendor tree uses "SECURE_KEY" as default modifier.
>
> Being binary compatible with other implementations is not an objective
> for this patch set. If you need to migrate I'd suggest to get out a
> clear text password and side-load it into the trusted key framework.
Compatibility is only one argument, IMHO the much stronger argument is that there are
people out there that want to salt the CAAM blob with a key modifier of their
own choice.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists