[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210401110301.GA31407@lpieralisi>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:03:01 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] PCI: rcar: Convert to MSI domains
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:38:19AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:19:57 +0100,
> Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static void rcar_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > + unsigned long pa = virt_to_phys(msi);
> > >
> > > - hwirq = rcar_msi_alloc_region(msi, nvec);
> > > - if (hwirq < 0)
> > > - return -ENOSPC;
> > > + /* Use the msi structure as the PA for the MSI doorbell */
> > > + msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
> > > + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
> >
> > I don't think this change is aligned with the previous patch (is it ?),
> > the PA address we are using here is different from the one programmed
> > into the controller registers - either that or I am missing something,
> > please let me know.
>
> Err. You are right. This looks like a bad case of broken conflict
> resolution on my part.
>
> The following snippet should fix it. Let me know if you want me to
> resend the whole thing or whether you are OK with applying this by
> hand.
I will apply it and merge the whole series into -next, thanks for
implementing it !
Lorenzo
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
> index f7331ad0d6dc..765cf2b45e24 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
> @@ -573,11 +573,10 @@ static int rcar_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask,
> static void rcar_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> - unsigned long pa = virt_to_phys(msi);
> + struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &msi_to_host(msi)->pcie;
>
> - /* Use the msi structure as the PA for the MSI doorbell */
> - msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
> - msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
> + msg->address_lo = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIALR) & ~MSIFE;
> + msg->address_hi = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIAUR);
> msg->data = data->hwirq;
> }
>
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists