[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210331172534.4ea75eda7e7accd166eef8b4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:25:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: kernel warning percpu ref in obj_cgroup_release
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:45:12 +0800 Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Now we have two choices to fix this issue.
>
> 1) Send a v6 patchset (Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge kmem pages)
> to fix this issue.
> 2) Send a separate fix patch (Just like above).
>
> Both ways are ok for me. But I want to know which one is more
> convenient for you.
Either is OK. 2) is easier.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists