| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANgfPd-bT17peopt71dh=fZkOmb=goVGmBNBC201gc29GGX7jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:50:28 -0700
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zap gfn range to operate under
the mmu read lock
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:58 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 31/03/21 23:08, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > To reduce lock contention and interference with page fault handlers,
> > allow the TDP MMU function to zap a GFN range to operate under the MMU
> > read lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 15 ++++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 6 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 667d64daa82c..dcbfc784cf2f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -3155,7 +3155,7 @@ static void mmu_free_root_page(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t *root_hpa,
> > sp = to_shadow_page(*root_hpa & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
> >
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_page(sp))
> > - kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, sp);
> > + kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, sp, false);
> > else if (!--sp->root_count && sp->role.invalid)
> > kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, invalid_list);
> >
> > @@ -5514,13 +5514,17 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
> > - flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
> > + read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end,
> > + true);
> > if (flush)
> > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> > - }
> >
> > - write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + }
> > }
>
> This will conflict with Sean's MMU notifier series patches:
>
> KVM: x86/mmu: Pass address space ID to __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range()
>
> What I can do for now is change the mmu.c part of that patch to
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index e6e02360ef67..9882bbd9b742 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5510,15 +5510,15 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
> }
> }
>
> - if (flush)
> - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
> -
> if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
> - flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
> - if (flush)
> - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
> + flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, i, gfn_start,
> + gfn_end, flush);
> }
>
> + if (flush)
> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
> +
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
>
>
> but you will have to add a separate "if (flush)" when moving the write_unlock
> earlier, since there's no downgrade function for rwlocks. In practice it's
> not a huge deal since unless running nested there will be only one active MMU.
>
> Paolo
Thank you for doing that. I also figured that the extra flushes when
running nested would probably be worth it to get the parallelism
gains. I don't mind working out those conflicts in v2.
>
> > static bool slot_rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
> > @@ -5959,7 +5963,8 @@ static void kvm_recover_nx_lpages(struct kvm *kvm)
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(!sp->lpage_disallowed);
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_page(sp)) {
> > kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, sp->gfn,
> > - sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
> > + sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level),
> > + false);
> > } else {
> > kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list);
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->lpage_disallowed);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > index d255125059c4..0e99e4675dd4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,15 @@ void kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> > }
> >
> > +static __always_inline void kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + bool shared)
> > +{
> > + if (shared)
> > + lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + else
> > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > if (!kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled)
> > @@ -42,7 +51,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> > }
> >
> > static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > - gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield);
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool shared);
> >
> > static void tdp_mmu_free_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> > {
> > @@ -66,11 +75,12 @@ static void tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
> > tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
> > }
> >
> > -void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
> > +void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > + bool shared)
> > {
> > gfn_t max_gfn = 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
> >
> > - lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
> >
> > if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
> > return;
> > @@ -81,7 +91,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
> > list_del_rcu(&root->link);
> > spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> >
> > - zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, max_gfn, false);
> > + zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, max_gfn, false, shared);
> >
> > call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> > }
> > @@ -94,11 +104,11 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
> > * function will return NULL.
> > */
> > static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> > - struct kvm_mmu_page *prev_root)
> > + struct kvm_mmu_page *prev_root,
> > + bool shared)
> > {
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *next_root;
> >
> > - lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > @@ -117,7 +127,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > if (prev_root)
> > - kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, prev_root);
> > + kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, prev_root, shared);
> >
> > return next_root;
> > }
> > @@ -127,11 +137,15 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> > * This makes it safe to release the MMU lock and yield within the loop, but
> > * if exiting the loop early, the caller must drop the reference to the most
> > * recent root. (Unless keeping a live reference is desirable.)
> > + *
> > + * If shared is set, this function is operating under the MMU lock in read
> > + * mode. In the unlikely event that this thread must free a root, the lock
> > + * will be temporarily dropped and reacquired in write mode.
> > */
> > -#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root) \
> > - for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL); \
> > - _root; \
> > - _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root))
> > +#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _shared) \
> > + for (_root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, NULL, _shared); \
> > + _root; \
> > + _root = tdp_mmu_next_root(_kvm, _root, _shared))
> >
> > /* Only safe under the MMU lock in write mode, without yielding. */
> > #define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root) \
> > @@ -632,7 +646,8 @@ static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
> > * Return false if a yield was not needed.
> > */
> > static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
> > - struct tdp_iter *iter, bool flush)
> > + struct tdp_iter *iter, bool flush,
> > + bool shared)
> > {
> > /* Ensure forward progress has been made before yielding. */
> > if (iter->next_last_level_gfn == iter->yielded_gfn)
> > @@ -644,7 +659,11 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
> > if (flush)
> > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> >
> > - cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + if (shared)
> > + cond_resched_rwlock_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + else
> > + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > WARN_ON(iter->gfn > iter->next_last_level_gfn);
> > @@ -662,23 +681,33 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
> > * non-root pages mapping GFNs strictly within that range. Returns true if
> > * SPTEs have been cleared and a TLB flush is needed before releasing the
> > * MMU lock.
> > + *
> > * If can_yield is true, will release the MMU lock and reschedule if the
> > * scheduler needs the CPU or there is contention on the MMU lock. If this
> > * function cannot yield, it will not release the MMU lock or reschedule and
> > * the caller must ensure it does not supply too large a GFN range, or the
> > * operation can cause a soft lockup.
> > + *
> > + * If shared is true, this thread holds the MMU lock in read mode and must
> > + * account for the possibility that other threads are modifying the paging
> > + * structures concurrently. If shared is false, this thread should hold the
> > + * MMU lock in write mode.
> > */
> > static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > - gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield)
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool shared)
> > {
> > struct tdp_iter iter;
> > bool flush_needed = false;
> >
> > + kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
> > +
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
> > +retry:
> > if (can_yield &&
> > - tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, flush_needed)) {
> > + tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, flush_needed,
> > + shared)) {
> > flush_needed = false;
> > continue;
> > }
> > @@ -696,8 +725,17 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
> > continue;
> >
> > - tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
> > - flush_needed = true;
> > + if (!shared) {
> > + tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
> > + flush_needed = true;
> > + } else if (!tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter)) {
> > + /*
> > + * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
> > + * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
> > + */
> > + iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
> > + goto retry;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > @@ -709,14 +747,20 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > * non-root pages mapping GFNs strictly within that range. Returns true if
> > * SPTEs have been cleared and a TLB flush is needed before releasing the
> > * MMU lock.
> > + *
> > + * If shared is true, this thread holds the MMU lock in read mode and must
> > + * account for the possibility that other threads are modifying the paging
> > + * structures concurrently. If shared is false, this thread should hold the
> > + * MMU in write mode.
> > */
> > -bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> > + bool shared)
> > {
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
> > bool flush = false;
> >
> > - for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root)
> > - flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, true);
> > + for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, shared)
> > + flush |= zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, true, shared);
> >
> > return flush;
> > }
> > @@ -726,7 +770,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
> > gfn_t max_gfn = 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
> > bool flush;
> >
> > - flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, 0, max_gfn);
> > + flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, 0, max_gfn, false);
> > if (flush)
> > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> > }
> > @@ -893,7 +937,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > int ret = 0;
> > int as_id;
> >
> > - for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
> > + for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> > as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
> > slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id);
> > kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) {
> > @@ -933,7 +977,7 @@ static int zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper(struct kvm *kvm,
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *root, gfn_t start,
> > gfn_t end, unsigned long unused)
> > {
> > - return zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, false);
> > + return zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, false, false);
> > }
> >
> > int kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> > @@ -1098,7 +1142,7 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> >
> > for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root->spt, root->role.level,
> > min_level, start, end) {
> > - if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false))
> > + if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, false))
> > continue;
> >
> > if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) ||
> > @@ -1128,7 +1172,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > int root_as_id;
> > bool spte_set = false;
> >
> > - for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
> > + for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> > root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
> > if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
> > continue;
> > @@ -1157,7 +1201,7 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
> > - if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false))
> > + if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, false))
> > continue;
> >
> > if (spte_ad_need_write_protect(iter.old_spte)) {
> > @@ -1193,7 +1237,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > int root_as_id;
> > bool spte_set = false;
> >
> > - for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
> > + for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> > root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
> > if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
> > continue;
> > @@ -1291,7 +1335,7 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
> > - if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, spte_set)) {
> > + if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, spte_set, false)) {
> > spte_set = false;
> > continue;
> > }
> > @@ -1326,7 +1370,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
> > int root_as_id;
> >
> > - for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
> > + for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> > root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
> > if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
> > continue;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> > index 9961df505067..855e58856815 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> > @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ __must_check static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> > return refcount_inc_not_zero(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count);
> > }
> >
> > -void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root);
> > +void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > + bool shared);
> >
> > -bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> > +bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> > + bool shared);
> > void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
> >
> > int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists