lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Apr 2021 17:49:46 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: wait for fifo space to be available
 before read/write



On 01/04/2021 15:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/1/21 4:00 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> If we write registers very fast we can endup in a situation where some
>> of the writes will be dropped without any notice.
>>
>> So wait for the fifo space to be available before reading/writing the
>> soundwire registers.
> 
> Out of curiosity, do you actually need to do a check in the read case as 
> well?

Yes, This is just to make sure the read command is finished and fifo is 
ready with data.

If not we will be reading quickly an empty fifo!

> 
> The commit message talks about writes getting dropped, is the opposite 
> also a problem?

Its highly likely, for safety I have added support for both write and 
read waits in this patch.


--srini
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ