[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j1-AA2fWmB0Cr=pr6d+qt_J7Vxr=RPnbvVBfqQYY3KuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:31:56 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers core: don't do anything in device_del() when
device_add() fail
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:56 PM Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Recently, our syzbot test reported NULL pointer dereference in
> device_del() by injecting memory allocation fail in device_add().
>
> For now, callers of device_add(), such as add_disk(), may ignore
> device_add()'s fail and go on working. In unregister path, it will
> call device_del() from del_gendisk(). That can cause various NULL
> pointer dereference, including dev->p is NULL in kill_device(),
> 'name' is NULL in sysfs_remove_link(), kobj->sd is 'NULL' when call
> dpm_sysfs_remove(), and so on.
>
> To avoid these kernel panic, we call device_del() only when device_add()
> is success.
The patch looks reasonable to me, but the above is not what it does.
It causes device_del() to be a no-op for devices that have not been
successfully added.
> Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index f29839382f81..a10ec5dbc577 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -3380,6 +3380,9 @@ void device_del(struct device *dev)
> struct class_interface *class_intf;
> unsigned int noio_flag;
>
> + if (!dev->p)
> + return;
> +
> device_lock(dev);
> kill_device(dev);
> device_unlock(dev);
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists