[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c368419-6e45-6b27-0f34-26b581589fa7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:44:02 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@...wei.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Gonglei <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Force to flush iotlb before creating
superpage
Hi Longpeng,
On 4/1/21 3:18 PM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index ee09323..cbcb434 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2342,9 +2342,20 @@ static inline int hardware_largepage_caps(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> * removed to make room for superpage(s).
> * We're adding new large pages, so make sure
> * we don't remove their parent tables.
> + *
> + * We also need to flush the iotlb before creating
> + * superpage to ensure it does not perserves any
> + * obsolete info.
> */
> - dma_pte_free_pagetable(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn,
> - largepage_lvl + 1);
> + if (dma_pte_present(pte)) {
The dma_pte_free_pagetable() clears a batch of PTEs. So checking current
PTE is insufficient. How about removing this check and always performing
cache invalidation?
> + int i;
> +
> + dma_pte_free_pagetable(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn,
> + largepage_lvl + 1);
> + for_each_domain_iommu(i, domain)
> + iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(g_iommus[i], domain,
> + iov_pfn, nr_pages, 0, 0);
> +
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists